@DavidSalo I don't get that argument. Let's say it's 100% the case. Then it follows we'd need to solve _that_ problem, which to me sounds fairly easy.
It does _not_ follow that it would be better to allow a President (or anyone!) to commit any and all crimes including murder. I seriously hope Judge "how do we write an opinion that would stop the floodgates" Henderson has a grip on that.