Ya Webster's Dictionary blew their credibility when they added "irregardless" to their dictionary - hard pass

@NorthernInvader Um … language is a living thing. Common usage today trumps what might have been considered correct usage in the past. If enough people today are using the word for a given meaning, it belongs in a dictionary. Sorry, but if language didn’t evolve according to usage we’d still be speaking English like Shakespeare or even pre-Chaucer.

@REDonaldAuthor @NorthernInvader linguistic prescriptivism is a different form of political conservatism, and in the end judging someone for using neologisms will always happen.

@ChumCugger

I am about as far from being a political (or any other kind) of conservative you could possibly imagine. I am however a graduate in english lit and had I ever used that in a paper it would have lowered my grade considerably and likely a talking to from my prof or TA.

We'll have to agree to disagree

@REDonaldAuthor

Follow

@NorthernInvader @ChumCugger I was a student of creative writing as well as linguistics at UBC. I wouldn’t use “irregardless” myself, but people have been using it for over 200 years so … 🤷‍♀️

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.