Follow
Alexander Deanda, the plaintiff in Deanda v. Becerra, is “raising each of his daughters in accordance with Christian teaching on matters of sexuality, which requires unmarried children to practice abstinence and refrain from sexual intercourse until marriage,” so he’s arguing that the availability of federally funded family planning services (birth control) tramples on his rights as a father to control his daughters’ sexuality. And trump judge Kacsmaryk bought that argument.
@Nupe117 Hmm. Guess Mr. Deanda doesn't trust "Train up a child in the way she should go: and when she is old, she will not depart from it" enough.