All right, folks. ⚖️

I take a bit longer with the chewier topics, but the result is *never* just a summary of proceedings.

Today's piece on SCOTUS oral arguments in Trump v. Anderson strives to explain the core tensions, propositions, and potential implications of different outcomes.

The short version: Today's oral arguments were weak on textual grounds--but that just means this right-wing SCOTUS has a delicate needle to thread, to achieve its expected ends coherently.

onlysky.media/mclark/scotus-tr

@MLClark I had expected someone to raise the question distinguishing between a primary ballot and a general election ballot. A primary ballot is for a political party to choose its candidate; the laws vary by state, but they're mostly "closed" meaning it's a private affair.

If a party chooses to nominate an ineligible candidate, is that anyone else's business? That ineligibility would only become important during the general election.

But it didn't come up, so far as I know.

Follow

@WordsmithFL

Yep! I mentioned that in my preamble, with respect to the question of private vs. states rights that could have been presented, but wasn't.

A lot of the petition was carefully avoiding other possible lines of inquiry - making for a flimsy case, but also one that couldn't be diverted from the core target.

@MLClark I've mentioned before that we were one plaintiff in Duke et al v. Smith, a 1992 Florida case. The judge basically concluded that a party decides who it wants to be its candidates. We didn't have the money or time to appeal it and it was a state case, not federal.

casetext.com/case/duke-v-smith

@WordsmithFL

Oof. More taxing business in your life. It's a wonder you've managed the serenity you have! :) Or maybe they're related? From the chaos, comes the calm?

The way this case was put together in the petition and Amici, it's *super* clear that they went lean because they didn't want to create variability in an outcome, and room for more cases. They want a top-down ruling that will affect all others at once.

Whether they get their wish... is not up to us! 🤷‍♀️

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.