Switching between Voyager & TOS rewatches, I find myself struck by how far gender discourse hadn't come in 30 years. *So* much reductive thinking: about women, about relationships, about masculinity.
But it's the writers, not the generation. (TNG & DS9 were between them, & much better!)
Every generation has had people who see us all as people... and people who can't imagine drama outside crude stereotypes.
Who was the first writer you remember really *getting* a different human point of view?
@MLClark I don't know if he's the very first but the way Robert Heinlein wrote Valentine Michael Smith in "Stranger in a Strange Land" is amazing.
He was able to write a character with no human bias or culture programming whatsoever and he pulled it off masterfully.
Oh, neat choice! The 60s and 70s were filled with SF that explored counterpoints to Anglo-Western culture through outsider critiques, but Heinlein still set an extremely high bar for later outings. Glad it resonated!
@MLClark As a novelist, I am a xenofiction specialist. My whole focus is on using non human perspectives to make insights/observations on humanity/culture.
The idea that Heinlein was able to create xenofiction _through_ a human main character is one of the many reasons he's considered a GOAT.
This is one of the reasons his picture hangs near my computer in my office nook.
Most of my sci-fi also features *expressly* alien aliens, so this is a key component of my writing, too. Social contract theory is best explored in the genre through confrontations with very different ways of being.
The history in commercial SF is fraught, though, with a bit of "noble savage" carryover from westerns and philosophical discourse, which also use an outsider POV to critique internal failings. Heinlein wasn't the first, but he definitely made the trope his own!
@MLClark I honestly feel like I could write a book about Heinlein's failings.
He was a man of his time. Good, bad, and cringe.
His work is greater than he was as a person.
Oh, I love Heinlein's work. Tunnel in the Sky was my go-to reread throughout my adolescence. I don't have heroes, so I don't mind that he's a flawed human being. We all are.
When I read him today, I also see the context he was writing in - a *lot* of SF wrestling with religious failings, and new cults. He captured his moment well.
Who else brought you to your love of xenofiction? I feel like Silverberg reaaaally tried, but his characterization always undermined worldbuilding.
(Also, if any of your other creative influences are from the fur world, that totally counts! I have a scaly in the fam - very much aware of the crossovers!)
@MLClark I'm an otherkin and therian. My first real convictions of non-human identity go back to my earliest memories.
We have a lot of intersection with furry culture and thus I have a lot of fur and scaly friends.
This dichotomy then, fascinates me. I'm living the isekai life.
A lot of my writing, I think is driven by my attempts both to communicate whats going on behind the scenes in my own soul, as well as share what I see in the world around me.
(1/2)
@MLClark Getting away from the personal aspect...it's to ask a question.
Is that which makes us different, enough to save us all?
There's a concept the Trekkie crew here on CoSo often talks about, from Vulcan philosophy: "Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations" (IDIC). It goes back to an episode in TOS, and celebrates that we cannot achieve truth and beauty without embracing the fullness of cosmic experience. Andy Weir has a short story, "The Egg", that imagines similar: only once we've experienced all subject positions in life can we transcend to a deeper state of being.
So one can only hope, eh? 🤞🏻🐇🕊
@MLClark My dad shared the Egg story with me as a child, and it is treasured.
As for Star Trek, life time fan for many reasons.
Roddenberry had some things truly dialed in.