Woman who spread Leopard bait all over her town never expected the Leopards would come to her town to eat THEIR faces
DIAF race hating lady
@Kinnison It would just be terrible if she lost her job and nobody would speak to her or serve her in public businesses.
@sfleetucker @Kinnison Honestly, that would be terrible.
Remember some Twilight zone type episode where a person got a forehead mark as a punishment for a crime. Everyone in society would treat him as if he didn't exist. He got mugged and a broken arm and couldn't get treatment. and that wasn't even the worst. It was the loneliness
Do not want to live in a society where that is a punishment. Civil fine and community service should be enough.
But put stockade for a few nights would also be okay
studies have shown people break laws mainly because they think they can get away with it. The consequences are not the deterrent
@Kinnison hmmm.... Do those studies include "shunning" as a possible consequence, or just the usual carceral tools of imprisonment, parole and fines?
@Kinnison I ask because in religious cults shunning is an extremely effective tool for controlling behavior. (See Amish, Christian Scientist, Mormon ...)
Yes, Negative enforcement is very effective. But also cruel and leads to abuse. There are better ways
I think it is better to improve society so much that people do not need to commit crimes to survive. And Not to use the fear of punishment to change behavior.
@Kinnison But this crime wasn't even close to being a necessity. She wasn't stealing bread for food (or to pay for drug even), she literally made up a lie for "clout" on social media, and then let that lie blossom into a massive assault on innocent immigrants.
what was the crime?
@Kinnison Stochastic Terrorism.
I am sorry, I should have asked you to be specific
show me the law that was broken. Stochastic Terrorism isn't technically a crime. That is a term used to describe behavior
look. I dont think this discussion is going anywhere. Neither of us is going to change our mind and it is getting very muddled in details.
@Kinnison agreed.