And in no surprise, Trump sues co-founders of Truth social to give shares to Trump for mistakes Trump made
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-demands-truth-social-co-223605596.html
Is that a countersuit to this? 👇
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/truth-social-founders-sue-trump-shares_n_65e0e296e4b013678e1468b5
no idea. I try not to get into the mind of Trump to understand why he does something
As of now it is two separate lawsuits
It's not a countersuit, he's judge shopping.
As an aside, fuck Glasscock for denying a rush hearing before the vote, then being "gobsmacked" about what trump is doing.
Don't act like you don't know who he is, then feign surprise when he acts how he always has. Bet those shares aren't "in escrow" either 🙄
But, "two justice systems" & trump is on the victim side, right? 🤬
if you are saying it isn't a countersuit, than why did you ask me if it was a countersuit?
Seems you knew the answer already 😕
but i didn't ask for that information about it being a countersuit, you did
it was confusing. Because in context it looked like you answered your own question after asking it.
there was no context like saying you looked into it afterwards. and were offering it. instead it looked like you were baiting me.
context matters. YOU know what you did but I did not know what you did.
I understand your perspective & I apologize again for the confusion. I'm also sorry that you'd assume I commented just to bait you, bc that's not who I am. Plus, it's honestly an odd thing to bait someone over.
In my experience, when someone asks a question and other person says they don't know, when an answer is found, it's provided as a courtesy. Next time I'll be sure to mention that I looked into it to avoid the confusion.
@Kinnison
Yes, and because I asked the question, when you said you didn't know, I decided to share the answer I found after I looked in case you were also curious.
I didn't know that was a terrible thing to do 🤷♀️