@Liliki @Graci Or we can just magnify it by having even more frequent fights about a larger number of judges. I don't think increasing the number of justices on the court will do anything but kick the can down the road maybe 4 years at most, then we will be back to square 1, only more frequently and bitterly.

@AskTheDevil @Graci unless you enshrine the number of justices in the court in the constitution.

@Liliki @Graci I don't really see that it makes a difference how many judges there are. The main reason people think it will change anything is they think "We'll just add three justices that do what we want, all fixed". Until a year, or two, or four, or six later, when more judges we don't like get added, too, and we're right back where we started, only with more frequent fights in congress.

What I think would work is term limits.

@Liliki @Graci
What I think would work better is to use the entire roster of eligible judges on a rotating basis.

The court could be made up of judges selected from the same pool SCOTUS is recuited from, with different judges on each case.

@AskTheDevil @Graci I think the first order of things would be to get rid of the corrupt justices. Also since trump is a traitor and Russian asset, anyone he's ever appointed should be removed as illegitimate.
It won't happen of course.
But that would be the right thing to do.