Follow

Turns out that when you have more than two big supermarket chains to choose from, prices are lower.

Who woulda thunk it? πŸ™„

theguardian.com/australia-news

@DyDave not really in πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦. we need a bit more competition. but all the biggies are owned by 2-3 companies. that's it.

@singlemaltgirl

We have two chains that control 65% of the market. They basically collude to rip people off mercilessly and have been getting away with it for decades. πŸ€·πŸΌβ€β™‚οΈ

@DyDave yes, that's us! and they've actually been caught once in awhile. then fined. then gone on to continue to do it.

@singlemaltgirl

They use the money they make ripping people off to pay the fines, then rip people off more to pay bonus dividends to shareholders.

And, at the other end, they collude to rip off farmers by artificially keeping produce prices low, so taxpayers have to help keep the farmers afloat to guarantee food supplies so that prices in the supermarket don’t go up even more.

It’s quite the scheme πŸ€·πŸΌβ€β™‚οΈ

@DyDave Monopolies tend to eat themselves. πŸ˜‰πŸ˜†

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.