Someone on the bird site posted a long thread about micro services. They suggested 90% of businesses (especially small/medium sized ones) should forego micro services and stick with monoliths. I tend to agree.

WRT monoliths, many of us ignored best practices, willingly took on gobs of technical debt, and did a poor job of DevOps. I doubt micro services will "fix" any of that.

@DaveMasonDotMe Disclaimer: not a developer. Wouldn't micro services allow for easier updates, even within major monolithic apps, since they are inherently black boxes, thus limiting the scope of changes?

@elric Disclaimer: I'm a former developer, and no longer "hands on". 🙂

But, yeah...easier updates (and isolation) is one of the promises of micro services.

On the flip side, multiple copies of data (for each micro svc) seems to be a necessity. Keeping those copies in sync is not easy. And you lose the ACID/transactional nature that's likely in a monolith. (You may see this referred to as 'eventual consistency'.)

Follow

@elric
I'm certainly not suggesting one design is better than the other. Just that they're different...and have tradeoffs. If you did a poor job with one design, migrating to a different design won't save you.

@DaveMasonDotMe Thanks for taking the time to explain Dave. There never is a silver bullet in IT. A new paradigm, poorly done, is still poorly done I guess.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.