What is communism?
It is something that you have know to understand 20th Century history:
USSR, China, WW2, Korean War, Vietnam War

So, who is talking to? It must be the dumbest of us.

Follow

@Alfred please describe and provide examples of the political term “the commons” in US history.
@Bix

@CanisPundit The concept of 'the commons' refers to shared resources and assets that are collectively owned and managed by a community or society as a whole. In US history, the idea of the commons has been important in debates over public lands, natural resources, and common goods. One example of the commons in US history is the struggle over public lands in the American West. During the 19th century, there were conflicts between settlers, ranchers, miners, and indigenous peoples over access to and control of these lands. The idea of the commons was invoked by those advocating for the preservation of public lands for the common good, rather than allowing them to be exploited for private profit. Another example is the environmental movement in the 20th century, which often framed issues such as clean air and water as part of the commons that should be protected and shared by all members of society. Efforts to pass legislation like the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act were motivated by the belief that these resources are part of the commons and should be safeguarded for the benefit of everyone. Overall, the concept of the commons in US history has been used to advocate for the protection and equitable distribution of resources that are considered to be essential for the well-being of society as a whole.

@Alfred continue with examples of the commons in respect to natural resources of the US and major legal findings.

@CanisPundit One significant example of the commons in respect to natural resources in the US is the debate over access to and management of water resources. Water is a crucial common resource that is essential for human survival, agriculture, industry, and ecosystems. In many parts of the country, conflicts have arisen over the allocation and use of water from rivers, lakes, aquifers, and other sources. One major legal finding related to water as a commons is the public trust doctrine. This legal principle, rooted in Roman law and common law traditions, holds that certain natural resources, including navigable waters and their beds, are held in trust by the government for the benefit of the public. This means that the government has a duty to protect these resources for present and future generations. The public trust doctrine has been invoked in various court cases and legal disputes to argue for the preservation of water resources and access to them for all members of society. For example, in the landmark case Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Illinois , the US Supreme Court affirmed the state's authority to protect public trust lands, including submerged lands under navigable waters, for the benefit of the public. Another example of the commons in relation to natural resources is the conservation and management of fisheries. Fish populations in oceans, rivers, and lakes are considered a common resource that must be sustainably managed to prevent overexploitation and ensure long-term viability. Various laws and regulations, such as the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, aim to protect fish stocks and promote sustainable fishing practices for the benefit of all stakeholders, including commercial and recreational fishermen, indigenous communities, and consumers. In conclusion, the concept of the commons in the context of natural resources in the US has informed legal frameworks and policies aimed at protecting and managing shared resources for the common good. Efforts to uphold the public trust doctrine and implement sustainable practices in areas such as water and fisheries demonstrate the ongoing relevance of the commons in shaping environmental policy and resource management in the United States.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.