Major & Action

In a recent clip, trump admitted having regular private conversations with putin. Conversations that were never recorded and where administrative/government staff were not present.

This FBI raid was conducted while this trump advisor is living in Russia. Imagine, another russian friend and advisor to trump is living in russia.

theguardian.com/us-news/articl

@Bliss So if these conversations weren't documented and were "Private", would they be deemed part of his "Official Duties" and immune per SCOTUS? 🤔

Follow

@Ironworker229

Unfortunately the scotus decision is clear, anything done, even in the outer perimeter of his role as president, is covered by presidential immunity. However if he did anything that violates the constitution it might be considered criminal, provided DoJ does not use his records (notes, emails, phone recordings) or conversations with staff as evidence.

@Bliss Understood. Are there not record-keeping requirements that may help to define official conduct?

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.