You can't force the Trump administration to cooperate with fighting global warning.

But if your area has a utility choice that is 100% wind/solar, you can choose it. It may cost more (though depending on the world political situation, sometimes they cost less).

If there is high demand for green energy and low demand for fossil fuels, no one will be investing their money in drill-baby-drill projects. They'll be adding increased capacity for green energy, because that's where the profit will be.

@AlphaCentauri

We chose the “wind” option and we pay a “pure and simple” fee for that, but then we get a “renewable fuel credit” equal to the Fuel Cost Adjustment, so it wipes that out. It was $1.13 to my benefit this month (you got me curious so I pulled it up). Seemed like the most obvious thing to do here in Oklahoma! 😂 💨

Follow

@whonat

I saw an article that Trump's plan to scrap the green programs in the Inflation Reduction Act are likely to be opposed by Republicans, since the vast majority of the money has gone to rural wind an southern solar projects in red districts.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.