All House members would have enough votes to rank all potential candidates in the order they would accept them.
Now it's a single ballot, but with all the candidates ranked in order of each voter's preference. The rounds of "voting" are all taken from those single ballots.
Person with fewest votes is eliminated after first round. Votes of people who listed him (and holy fuck they're STILL all hims?) would then go on to count for their second choice in the next round.
sounds great!
until you realise there are 10-20 GOP house members who don't care if the Government shuts down if they do not get the speaker they want. and another 10 who wouldn't vote for the first groups choice regardless.
they do not know how to govern and compromise anymore.
@Kinnison
That's the idea here. If they don't wish to rank anyone other than their first choice, all their subsequent rounds count as abstentions. By not compromising, they're effectively voting for Jeffries, because you don't need 217 if anyone abstains.
they would never agree to that rule. Not even the democrats
Next the person with the second fewest votes is eliminated and the next choices of those who chose him move up. And so on.
A member can decide not to rank any candidate they consider absolutely unacceptable, but if they run though their entire list of candidates and none of them is chosen, their blank line votes start counting as abstentions, so the 217 goal for choosing a winner drops lower.