Guess what? Apparently community guidelines and terms of service "violate free speech".
π
@mcfate Can't wait to see how this trainwreck plays out.
There's really only one possible outcome.
The hilariously pathetic part of it all is that he can't think of a single thing to do that would have even minimal appeal to anyone who wasn't already determined to vote for him no matter WHAT he did.
He's making himself more and more popular with fewer and fewer people, mostly because he completely lacks any sort of an imagination.
For starts, at a charitable count, only four out of a given ten voters don't like the idea of mailing their votes in, AND NO ONE IS PROPOSING THEY BE STOPPED FROM VOTING IN PERSON.
He'll be threatening to shut down the Postal Service for delivering requests for mail-in ballots by July at this rate.
That's sure to help him in November.
@thepacketrat
I'm more bemused by the government telling web sites how they can and can't conduct themselves to protect "free speech".
I don't suppose a judge will be able to make any better sense of it.
The laughing-out-of-court of Laura Loomer's "HELP HELP I'M BEING OPPRESSED" so-called "lawsuit" can't help Team Caligula's prospects here.