@catlynne333 I'm hopeful that there's more to it than even this. The list of documents/assets seized by the FBI was released along with the warrant (which instructed them to take any containers holding sensitive docs along with the docs themselves). Passports were not listed as an item in that list, meaning they were in one of the boxes of sensitive/classified info.
Dinner tonight: Lomito de cerdo al tamarindo y menta. Instant favorite.
@nuintari
3 (cont). Trusting the downstream network from your ISP or VPN to the target server is NOT the question (though your trusting ISP over VPN is not the best of decisions -- ISPs are frequently subject to warranted searches...VPNs rarely so). It's about protecting the user on their local untrusted network
@nuintari
3. Very few people realize that they have problematic app traffic. Very few realize what information a given app is sending over the network. All the more reason for a VPN when on an untrusted (public) network.
@nuintari
1. They don't move the goalpost for MitM attacks against SSL handshakes - they eliminate the possibility. Saying that users who would fall for those attacks don't use a VPN is a circular argument.
2. Can your location be tracked outside of IP? Certainly, which is why defense in depth is a thing. But that's a statement in FAVOR of VPNs as part of such an approach.
@nuintari pretty strong disagreement, here.
1. MitM attacks against SSL connections (or TLS 1.x connections) are simplistic -- 95% of your target base will happily click through the popup cert mismatch warning. HSTS helps, but requires that the user has been to the site previously.
2. VPNs help mask geo-location info leaks and/or blocks
3. VPNs will protect all traffic from your device...including app traffic that would otherwise be problematic.
@LiberalLibrarian had it three times myself...turned 50 last month and went in to get the vaccine as soon as I was eligible.
Best way to describe the pain is the rash/blisters that form are from the never firing strongly enough to blister the skin. It's excruciating.
And yes, face would _suck_. Some poor souls have gone blind from it hitting their ocular nerve.
@LiberalLibrarian
1. First and foremost, I agree WHOLEHEARTEDLY with the urging of people to go get the shingles vaccine. Shingles SUCKS.
2. If you had the rash on both legs, then it wasn't shingles. Shingles flareups will affect a single nerve (from the trunk outwards), and so are relegated to one half of the body. The "one side of the body only" nature of shingles is one of the easiest ways to tell if you have shingles.
@CannibalHoliday Quick (hopefully accurate) summary:
Some Amber Heard crazy fangirl got all butt-hurt at fearless leader's avi...fearless leader responded as expected (and warranted) to said protestations.
A more-than-suspicious temp lock of his account on the bird followed.
Piracy abounds as a show of support.
@Martha Let it happen on its own, Maurice.
@LiseL stay safe!
...though here in the midwest, that would be the point where we pull up a chair on the front porch and watch the show...
#CoSoPets
All right...it's been a good day since I posted much here, so here's Brighid, doing her very best Underdog impression.
@EmilySuess I got my first shot yesterday...along with my second covid booster (because I'm dumb like that). Last night was _rough_...doing better today, though.
Best wishes on a speedy recovery!
@CherNohio It’s a great cause that I can get behind, so figured I’d get the full experience and help out a bit :)
Hacker (ethical kind), recovered-ninja, blacksmith, geek, serial kilter.
That about covers it.