I tend to steer clear of politics...and given the signing of the EO, I suppose it could be argued that this is targeted censorship...but I'm going to have a hard time agreeing with the idea that any tweet from a president should be subject to a warning like this. Not that their account should be an exception, but that the president should not be tweeting stuff that can be considered "glorifying violence".
From the local news...if holding your nose to vote blue, would it have mattered who they threw up there? Sure, Biden is an "anybody will work" option, but were Sanders or Warren going to be harder sells for the rest of the left?
If Bernie ran as an Independent (the party he holds a Senate seat as), he'd still be in the race.
Maybe there are rules for getting in on debates, but I'd like to know how many people are relying strictly on debates/who he won over in those that he wouldn't win over with a simple commercial.
The party is at fault for not trusting him for two straight cycles...and he is at fault for trusting the party for two straight cycles.
Movie fan. Mets fan. I like to travel. Once scored a goal against a Jamaican soccer team in Cuba.
KOMA via VT #baseball
Occasionally live toot Mets games