60%? You know who said this? A company called The Lending Club. Where did they get their numbers? No fucking clue. They point to CNBC’s study which says 70%. However, it may come down to Survey Monkeys, an online survey company.
Sanders: "We are living in an economy today where people on top are doing phenomenally well while 60 percent of our people are living paycheck to paycheck."
That didn’t make Trump a better candidate or Harris a worse one.
Try again.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/bernie-sanders-working-class-angry-144221501.html
Bernie's a fuckin' schmuck.
AND YET I HAD TO VOTE FOR HIM IN VT STATE ELECTIONS!
Cuz I wasn't voting MAGA.
Duh.
Anyhoo, what the OTHER Mike Cohen sez --
Past Bernie Sanders needs to give today’s Bernie Sanders a kick in the crotch.
I guess he is sucking up to Trump?
The Bern is sticking the knife in the backs of the people he caucuses with.
So yes, maybe.
“However, "low-level waste" is a deceiving term because according to the nuclear industry about 85% of the waste also comes from nuclear facilities. The waste may encompass reactor core control rods, resins, sludges, and piping that may include hazardous elements such as plutonium, iodine-129, nicle-59, and strontium-90. These radioactive isotopes would be hazardous for thousands, even millions of years.”
2/2
@InUnfunky
Sanders is duplicitous—so much so he was willing to sell out poor Hispanics to put a nuclear waste dump in Texas. To argue he feels the pain of the working class pisses me off.
What’s more galling? He said it was just “medical waste” as if that was better.
https://www.texastribune.org/2016/02/28/Sanders-Nuclear-Waste-Votes-Divide-Texas-Activists/
You know who fought it?
Sierra Club.
https://www.sierraclub.org/texas/big-bend/radioactive-waste-west-texas
1/2