@Alfred Let me know if relates to other question

@ApostatePerry It appears that the information provided in the article about Saudi complicity in the 9/11 attacks may be related to your previous question about the impact of the 9/11 attacks on U.S. foreign policy. The new evidence discussed in the article could potentially challenge or reshape the understanding of the events surrounding 9/11 and, by extension, influence how U.S. foreign policy has evolved since then. If you would like to explore this connection further or have any other questions, feel free to ask.

@Alfred can you explain this?

@ApostatePerry Certainly! The article about Saudi complicity in the 9/11 attacks suggests that there may have been involvement or support from individuals or entities within Saudi Arabia in the planning or execution of the September 11th terrorist attacks. If this information is confirmed or further investigated, it could potentially challenge the official narrative of 9/11 and shed new light on the roles different countries played in the events leading up to and following the attacks. In terms of U.S. foreign policy, the revelation of Saudi involvement in the 9/11 attacks could have significant implications. Saudi Arabia has long been a key U.S. ally in the Middle East, and any evidence linking the country to a major terrorist event like 9/11 could strain relations between the two nations. It could also prompt a reevaluation of U.S. policies towards Saudi Arabia, including military cooperation, arms sales, and diplomatic ties. Furthermore, if the allegations of Saudi complicity are substantiated, it may lead to calls for accountability, justice, and potential changes in U.S. foreign policy towards countries suspected of supporting terrorism. The impact of this new information could be far-reaching and complex, as it could affect not only U.S.-Saudi relations but also broader counterterrorism efforts, regional stability, and global perceptions of U.S. foreign policy.

@Alfred So Osama was a threat to the American way of life...like snowden, assange...did I miss anyone?

@ApostatePerry Osama bin Laden, Edward Snowden, and Julian Assange are all individuals who have been perceived as threats to aspects of the American way of life, but for different reasons and in different ways. Osama bin Laden was the leader of the terrorist organization Al-Qaeda responsible for the 9/11 attacks, which resulted in the deaths of nearly 3,000 people and had a significant impact on U.S. national security and foreign policy. Edward Snowden is a former National Security Agency contractor who leaked classified information revealing the extent of surveillance programs carried out by the U.S. government. His actions raised concerns about privacy rights, government transparency, and the balance between national security and civil liberties. Julian Assange is the founder of WikiLeaks, an organization that publishes classified documents and information from anonymous sources. Assange has been involved in releasing sensitive government files, including diplomatic cables and classified military information. His actions have sparked debates about freedom of information, government accountability, and the role of whistleblowers in exposing misconduct or wrongdoing. While these individuals have been controversial and their actions have raised questions about the boundaries of national security, privacy, and transparency, they each represent different challenges to the American way of life. Osama bin Laden's terrorism threatened American lives and security, while Edward Snowden and Julian Assange have challenged government secrecy and surveillance practices in the name of transparency and accountability. Each case raises complex issues about the tension between security and freedom, and the role of individuals in shaping and challenging government policies and actions.